March Poll: Player of the Month

Who gets your vote for the best performances over the past month?

Single out your top performer over the last four weeks, a stretch that has included such games a dramatic agame against barcelona, a draw to Birmingham and a late win to Burnley.

Candidates might include the unbelievably impressive Gael Clichy, who has found form and is certainly scrapping with Evra for his international position. Alternatively, Campbell might top your list, for turning up for the Gunners when we needed him most and helping us through a difficult period of injuries. Almunia might even warrant a pick; he’s had some great form with shot-stopping, such as the penalty save and the Barca game.

[polldaddy poll=2997664]

In the leading up to the end of the season, we’d love to share discussion with you on the forum,

Curt.B

Loading...

5 Comments

  1. Anon.

    April 2, 2010 at 8:29 pm

    Big nikki b, chipping in with goals and assists!

  2. Chandler

    April 2, 2010 at 9:24 pm

    That is a hard one. Its gotta be NASRI!
    If things go the way we need them to and Nasri plays to his best he will be neat months also.
    Soul

  3. Andrew

    April 2, 2010 at 9:36 pm

    Not saying he necessarily would get my vote, but leaving Cesc off the list altogether must be a slight oversight?

    Vote this month could go to anyone of about 11 players, am very proud to be an Arsenal fan!

    Just realised this is the blog who had the petition to sack Wenger a few months ago? I always check the authors section of this site and notice a couple of names which give the site zero credibility which is unfortunate for a couple of good authors on here.

  4. Curt.B

    April 2, 2010 at 10:42 pm

    Definatrely an oversight for which i apologise, I will go about adding him

  5. Curt.B

    April 3, 2010 at 12:07 am

    “Just realised this is the blog who had the petition to sack Wenger a few months ago? I always check the authors section of this site and notice a couple of names which give the site zero credibility which is unfortunate for a couple of good authors on here.”

    Foolish standpoint – surely the authors in question have zero credibility, not the site. That would be the reasonable and pragmatic angle to look at it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *