Hangeland claims he 'rejected' Arsenal

Articles, opinion and analysis on tactics, players and off the field issues.

Hangeland claims he 'rejected' Arsenal

by Curt.B » Sat May 01, 2010 9:50 pm

HANGELAND - I WAS RIGHT TO SNUB ARSENAL


Brede Hangeland feels Fulham's European success proves he was right to snub the overtures of Arsenal.

The Norwegian centre-half has seen his profile rise considerably since he joined the Cottagers in 2008, leading to regular reports of interest from afar.

Arsenal have often been linked with a big-money approach, viewing the towering 28-year-old as an ideal candidate to help plug their sometimes shaky back four.

Hangeland, though, has always sought to steer clear of the speculation, maintaining that he is happy at Craven Cottage.

That loyalty has been repaid in spades this season, with Roy Hodgson's men readying themselves for the Europa League final after a remarkable run in continental competition came to head on Thursday as they saw off Hamburg in the last four.

Hangeland said in The Sun: "I've had so many great nights at Fulham and that was probably the best one.

"I signed my new contract here so I could take part in games like that and I'm really happy to be at this club.

"Does this justify rejecting a move to Arsenal? I think so.


"Nights like that are for the history books and something I will always remember."

But Hangeland has reminded Fulham's Europa League heroes there are still Barclays Premier League points up for grabs.

Hangeland admits the prospect of meeting Atletico Madrid in their European finalin Hamburg on May 12 will be dominating every player's thoughts.

It will be the biggest match in the club's 131-year history and will conclude a fairytale season under Hodgson.

But Hangeland insists that with a 10th successive season in the Premier League already guaranteed, Fulham must not lose interest in their domestic duties.

First up is Saturday's trip to West Ham with fixtures against Stoke and Arsenal also to come.

"Of course the final will be in the back of our minds but the worst thing we could do would be to drop the standard in the Premier League and then think we can raise it again for the final," he said.

"We need to keep going the way we have done all season and do our best in the league games, which will be good preparation for the final.

"You need to perform to stay in good shape, both as individuals and as a team, so I'm sure the manager will not let us drop our standards."

Fulham's passage to the final has been remarkable given they initially viewed Europe as a pleasant distraction that had the potential to jeopardise their more pressing domestic priorities.

The competition's importance snowballed as they progressed, however, collecting a string of heavyweight scalps that has caught everyone's imagination.

"I think it's great to play in Europe. It's a break from the usual games in the Premier League and it's a different kind of football," said Hangeland.

"Everyone associated with the club loves these games. You could see against Hamburg on Thursday how much it means to everyone.

"To be one of the 11 playing is a big honour and to get to the final is a great achievement."

Hodgson's first-choice team has a settled look to it and the Fulham manager will nurse his squad carefully over the next two weeks.

Top scorer Bobby Zamora is the only major concern and it is hoped intensive treatment will enable him to overcome his Achilles injury in time to face the Spaniards.

Simon Davies, who fired a brilliant equaliser against Hamburg, has urged his team-mates to temporarily shelve their thoughts of European glory.

"We will not get too carried away with anything and the manager was already talking about West Ham when we were in the dressing room after the game," he said.

"When the final comes around in a couple of weeks we will enjoy it, but now we just have to get ready to face West Ham."



"I signed my new contract here so I could take part in games like that and I'm really happy to be at this club.

"Does this justify rejecting a move to Arsenal? I think so."

Perhaps this is a feeling mirrored in other players we want to sign. I said earlier that there would come a point where excellent players don't want to come to Arsenal because they truly believe they will never achieve something at the club.
Image
User avatar
Curt.B
Emmanuel Petit
 
Posts: 1537
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:51 am

Re: Hangeland claims he 'rejected' Arsenal

by ArsenalZeBest » Sun May 02, 2010 2:52 am

If Fulham would have lost the game or in a relegation battle it would have been a whole new story but that didn't happen but their are CB's better than Hangeland....

ArsenalZeBest
Michael Thomas
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 8:20 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Hangeland claims he 'rejected' Arsenal

by Kerr345 » Sun May 02, 2010 4:42 am

Significantly better.

And no, this has nothing to do with not achieving, since Fulham haven't achieved more than Arsenal. Hangeland just sounds like a stand up guy who really likes his club. He feels more connected to it, so he gets more out of the major games.
Kerr345
Steve Williams
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:35 pm

Re: Hangeland claims he 'rejected' Arsenal

by Sinbad » Sun May 02, 2010 10:44 am

He was right.

They are in a cup final in euro and have had a great season.
GET WELL SOON AARON RAMSEY

User avatar
Sinbad
Frank McLintock
 
Posts: 790
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 4:44 pm
Location: London

Re: Hangeland claims he 'rejected' Arsenal

by Craigie » Sun May 02, 2010 10:50 am

We would be in that cup final if we were in that cup.

The Fulham, Liverpool, Hamburg and Atletico of this season are not good teams.
Craigie
George Graham
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 1:43 am

Re: Hangeland claims he 'rejected' Arsenal

by Roger Milla » Sun May 02, 2010 12:00 pm

Craigie wrote:We would be in that cup final if we were in that cup.

The Fulham, Liverpool, Hamburg and Atletico of this season are not good teams.



I dont think we would TBH

Roger Milla
Steve Williams
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:43 am

Re: Hangeland claims he 'rejected' Arsenal

by Kerr345 » Sun May 02, 2010 2:56 pm

I don't think I would care TBH.
Kerr345
Steve Williams
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:35 pm

Re: Hangeland claims he 'rejected' Arsenal

by The Fabster » Mon May 03, 2010 12:31 am

We are in the cups and got what we deserved this season. We are the third best team in the league and not as good as Barccelona, nor do we have the squads to compete in the F.A cup and CC, which are ultimately 3rd and 4th choice competitions to Wenger.

And no, we wouldn't storm the UEFA cup. We proved that in 2000.

PL teams who have done more than Arsenal in recent years:

Portsmouth
United
Chelsea
Liverpool
Fulham
Tottenham
Middlesborough
Hell, even Cardiff have reached an F.A Cup final..
The Fabster
George Eastham
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:19 pm

Re: Hangeland claims he 'rejected' Arsenal

by Kerr345 » Mon May 03, 2010 12:51 am

Ya, because that totally means they are more successful, entertaining, or good. I understand being disappointed, but this is stupid. Only Chelsea, Liverpool, and United have accomplished more than Arsenal in the past few years and with much, much higher costs and much weaker monetary base now. This summer is the deciding factor. If Wenger doesn't buy what is needed, then yes, he needs to go.
Kerr345
Steve Williams
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:35 pm

Re: Hangeland claims he 'rejected' Arsenal

by cerbera » Mon May 03, 2010 6:42 am

The Fabster wrote:We are in the cups and got what we deserved this season. We are the third best team in the league and not as good as Barccelona, nor do we have the squads to compete in the F.A cup and CC, which are ultimately 3rd and 4th choice competitions to Wenger.

And no, we wouldn't storm the UEFA cup. We proved that in 2000.

PL teams who have done more than Arsenal in recent years:

Portsmouth
United
Chelsea
Liverpool
Fulham
Tottenham
Middlesborough
Hell, even Cardiff have reached an F.A Cup final..

Portsmouth have done better than us? The 1 FA Cup? Have you forgotten they've gotten relegated this season while we haven't lost our status as a top 4 team? We've qualified for the last 10 consecutive Champions Leagues if not more. 1 FA Cup win against a lower division team doesn't count.

How have Liverpool done better than us? All the cups they won last decade were won dubiously. Their drought is just 1 season short of ours.

Fulham have made 1 cup final....we made the Champions League final 4 years ago and at the risk of sounding like a broken record we're in the CL every season...are they?

Tottenham? When's the last time they finished higher than us in the league? Are you really gonna use their Carling Cup to say they've done better than us? The Carling Cup? Really? Our Proving Ground Tournament? A tourney we use to test our youngsters that they use full grown men in? You can't be serious.

Middlesbrough...same as Spurs comment above but add relegation to that.

Were you making a joke with that post above? You must've been. How can you seriously say those teams have had greater success than us recently? Are you that biased against Arsenal FC? That's not even something a sensible rival fan would say about our club. You're letting your bias against Arsene Wenger cloud your judgement of Arsenal FC.

God of the boards
Think for yourself, question authority.

cerbera
Chief Executive
 
Posts: 2060
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:11 pm
Location: Parts Unknown

Next

Return to Arsenal Action Area

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest




Our Friends
Email us : [email protected]