by Jason Goldstein on Sat May 09, 2009 9:10 am
"If you ask the players in what position, you will never get their position. Everyone can have opinions but the people who make decisions have responsibilities for the longer-term of the club."
Wenger argued that he had spent "big" in buying Andrei Arshavin for £15 million, but estimates that it will be 10 years, when the stadium debt is paid off, before Arsenal have closed Manchester United's financial advantage.
"I'm not chasing any player, I believe my priority is to stay with the squad we have," he said. "It is not all down to spending, it is down to sticking to a policy. Chelsea have spent magic money but still have not won the European Cup.
Wenger`s attitude at times is too risk adverse for my liking, he doesn´t seem to realise that the right investment in star quality has a habit of paying for itself. Were R.Ferdinand or Rooney overly expensive signings? No because a) they solved long term problem positions b) their quality brought the trophies that lead to bigger prize monies and c) they generate the interest that puts bums on seats and causes companies to throw large sponsorhip deals your way and d) at many points during their career they could have been sold on for at least the same value they were bought at.
He also fails to acknowledge that Manchester United have more debt at higher interest rates than us. Although they have a larger operating profit they actually have suffered big losses year on year during the Glazer era, while we have probably been the most profitable football club in the world over the last 3 seasons. So why are we going to have to wait 10 seasons to close the financial gap on them? If we keep on acting small time by the time 10 years comes around their revenue will be far outsripping us just like at Highbury beacuse people pay for winners.
I´m sure Kronke understands that Arsenal need to improve their brand image before it comes to renegotiating our next set of commercial deals if we really are to compete with Man U, and that involves star players and trophies. We understandably got screwed on the last set given the circumstances but we can`t let that happen again.
If we did splash big on a Benzema or Aguerro (30m+), even if it didn`t pan out like we hoped can you really say that we wouldn`t recoup at least 20m+ on them the following season. Is 10m really that much of a gamble considering what those kind of players could bring to the club?
Now I´m not saying we should spend irreponsible but can anyone on here really say we have a small squad? What we have is an imbalanced squad with a plethora of good players but very few top end ones (stictly talking Ronaldo, Gerrard, Torres, Essien, Vidic, Ferdinand, Rooney, Terry type players). We have a massive wage bill becasue Wenger refuses to cut the fat, if he sold a few of the fringe players and plumped the cash together I´m sure he could get enough cash together to get 2-4 quality signings.
For me, we could afford to offload Traore, Senderos, Gallas (simply because I don`t think he would accept a bench spot, and I would rather find a partner for Kolo than him), Diaby, Simpson, Adebayor and Van Persie (because I think Arshavin should be playing in his position) this summer. Which would pull over 50m to add to the summer kitty and would still leave a reasonable 24 man squad:
Almunia, Fabianski
Clichy, Gibbs
Kolo, Silvestre, Djourou, Song
Sagna, Eboue
Walcott, Wilshere
Fabregas, Denilson, Ramsey, Nasri
Rosicky, Merida
Eduardo, Arshavin, Vela, Bendtner
Add to that 2 centre backs, a centre mid and a striker (ideally Zapata, Albiol, Matuidi and Benzema) and we could have a shot of actually winning something.