Deano wrote:Craigie wrote:The problem with these 2 players is 1) Arsenal fans are never happy and 2) They are delusional.
You think Eboue is a stunning right back because he plays in 20% of the games, while Sagna has not been as good as he has previously and has made some mistakes.
When you make Eboue first choice and he plays 30 league games a season and makes defensive errors (because he will...guaranteed) you'll be crying out for the solidity of Sagna, "why are we leaving the mighty Sagna on the bench and playing this clown?!?!?!". This time last year the tune on this forum was he's not good enough we need to sell him with only a handful of people saying he is backup and he's pretty good for backup.
I like them both, don't mind which of them plays, but I'm sick of people wanting to hate on Sagna when he really hasn't been that bad, and having delusions of how wonderful a player Eboue is, and then having the cheek to say that we could do better than Sagna. In 2008 when we played a system that suited his play he was PL right back of the year, and honestly that year probably world right back of the year. Even when our season started to crumble, he was still one of our top performers. Maybe it's confidence or something... I don't know, but Vidic has been this year, doesn't stop him being one of the most desirable pieces of centre back in world football.
I don't hate Sagna, Craigie, and can appreciate what he brings to the team. However, I've now had enough time to come to the conclusion that for all he brings, Eboue would prove to be the better option in a side so F##king HELL BENT ON USING ATTACKING FULL-BACKS... as we are.
I arrived at this conclusion by asking myself the following questions:
1) Who is the better defender? Most believe Sagna is, although I'm not sure why IMO.
2) Who is the better attacker? No brainer. Eboue by a distance.
Conclusion: Is Sagna a better defender - if at all - than Eboue is an attacker? For me, a resounding NO!
So little comes from Sagnas side that he is, infact, a liability in defence as well as attack, by way of being absent from his first job (defending) with no product to show or justification for being past the halfway line other than to not play strikers onside. Yes, he's THAT bad.
Eboue, for all his alleged short comings defensively, cuts inside and commits defenders more in one game than Sagna will in half a season. We are an attacking side that relys on scoring goals and NOT clean sheets, which means we have to play to our strengths. It's not as if Sagna is a tower of defensive strength ffs, or installs great confidence in that position.
Therefore its a total no brainer as to who should be our regular RB. Without question.