
Curt.B wrote:I think the 'Sagna is a better defender' line is almost a myth. It seems to have become true by popular belief, really. Its difficult, when you think about it, to truly distinguish anything between the two players defensive capabilities.

Curt.B wrote:I think the 'Sagna is a better defender' line is almost a myth. It seems to have become true by popular belief, really. Its difficult, when you think about it, to truly distinguish anything between the two players defensive capabilities.

Craigie wrote:I think the opposite. Talking Sagna down so much is convincing people that Eboue is great.
Craigie wrote:Sagna has never had catastrophies on the scale of Eboue. There have been times when Eboue playing has been similar in fans hearts to having Fabianski play now. He was the most hated player at this club.
Craigie wrote: few times this season Eboue has just fallen over. No challenge just fallen, slipped, whatever. Never seen it mentioned. If Sagna fell over this season it would be "useless C##t can't even stand up properly".
Craigie wrote:Both are good, neither are great in the current system. Don't mind which one plays. I do think Sagna is the better defender. In terms of pure defending, I think he makes better tackles and is better in the air defensively. His positioning has been off a lot this season though which is a worry.
Craigie wrote:I think Eboue is the better football player, that's why he can play makeshift right wing while Sagna can't. I think Eboue deserves a run of games even if it's just to give Sagna a kick up the arse.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests