Ottoman wrote:
Diaby isnt . Aston villa, Fenerbahce, Villareal away, villareal home. 4 games where diaby was MOTM by a country mile last season. He dominated those games. and they meant something.
diaby is 22 for f##k sake...how can you say hes ? Show me drogba, arshavin, etc when they were 22. Id ask you who the f##k thses wasters were, and you and everybody else would probably agree.
this is what i mean by thickle. you MOAN like theres no tommorow that we dont retain enough players, and therefore they cant become leaders and veterans etc. Well why would you then go and put down developing players trying to improve? Diaby has the potential to be an amzing central midfielder in the future. JUST like denilson, JUST like song. JUST like walcott and JUST like wilsshere.
wilsshere's tricks and flicks, along with walcotts pace sstand out alot more than what diaby/denilsson do. but they still do work, and good work. we all remember the run at anfield and wilsheres magical pass, but you CANT blame diaby for not doing the same thing, hess not that kind of player. he gives us something different.
Its like saying, should vela take over Nasris position. They both offer completely different things. We all remember Velas chips and goals, but nasri contributes in a different way, thats also great.
just let wilshere grow up lol, wenger will know when to bring him in, its what hes good at.
ottoman I completly understand what are you talking about,those two are completely two different type of players,one is a hard man while other is more creative,people are impressed with Wilshere performance but the question is Diaby or Wilshere?somehow it is logical if you want to see a good game and a few tricks to pick Wilshere ahead of Diaby!mate,maybe we should ask ourselves is this a proper question than and leave this behind!this is a tricky question
